Short answer
Yes, but it is a manual takeoff. Bluebeam Revu lets you mark up a PDF, count symbols, measure lengths and export the markup list to a spreadsheet, while you identify each member and type its size yourself. It has no built-in knowledge of steel shapes or weights, so weights and totals come from your own tables.
How a Bluebeam steel takeoff works
- Open the structural PDF and set the drawing scale per sheet.
- Create a tool set with one count tool per member type, or one tool with a custom column for the designation.
- Click each member on each plan to count it. Use the length measurement tool for lineal footage.
- Fill in the size in a custom column.
- Export the markups list to CSV or Excel.
- In the spreadsheet, look up weight per foot for each size and compute totals.
It is flexible, familiar and useful for markup, collaboration and measuring areas. It also means the estimator does all the identification and classification.
Where Bluebeam works well for steel
Bluebeam is strong for one-off measurement, for non-standard items, for marking up what you counted, and for sharing with a team. Misc metals with odd lengths, rails measured along a stair, and areas for deck are natural fits. Many estimators use it alongside other tools.
Where it gets slow
On a large set with hundreds of members, clicking every beam is the work. Schedules need manual reconciliation. Weights come from a separate table, so a typo in a size silently produces a wrong weight. There is no check that a size exists, and no way to handle a UK or Australian designation other than typing it. It is also easy to miss a member on page 40 of 60.
That is the gap automated takeoff addresses: SteelFlo finds and boxes every member callout and lets you verify, and weights come from the section tables. You can keep Bluebeam for markup and use SteelFlo to count. See SteelFlo vs Bluebeam for steel takeoffs.
Can you combine them?
Yes. Export the bill of materials from SteelFlo to CSV and the highlighted PDF for sharing, then use Bluebeam for markup, RFIs and review with your team. The takeoff tool counts; the markup tool communicates.
Tips if you do use Bluebeam for steel
- Build a tool set with one tool per member type and color-code by category.
- Use a custom column for size and one for length, then export the markups list.
- Calibrate the scale on every sheet. A wrong scale ruins every length.
- Take off schedules first and put the key in a note on the sheet.
- Use layers or subjects to separate passes so you can see what you have counted.
- Check your list against the shape tables for typos. A size that does not exist will silently produce a zero weight.
Doing this carefully is slow but workable, and it is the right tool for odd one-off scope.
What are the alternatives?
A spreadsheet with a PDF viewer is the simplest. On-screen digitizing tools offer more automation for measuring. Steel-specific AI takeoff reads the member callouts directly. Outsourced services do the work for you. See SteelFlo vs Excel and Steel takeoff software comparison.
Is Bluebeam still worth keeping?
Yes for most estimators. It is useful for redlining, RFIs, reviewing shop drawings and sharing with GCs. The question is not whether to keep it but whether to use it for counting. If counting is your bottleneck, a dedicated takeoff tool takes that task off it.
Stop counting steel by hand.
Upload your drawing set and SteelFlo puts a box on every steel label it finds, on every page. You verify the boxes and export a bill of materials.
Go deeper
- Steelflo vs Bluebeam Revu: Which Is Better for Steel Takeoffs?
- Steelflo vs Excel: AI Takeoff vs. Spreadsheet Workflow
- Manual vs AI Steel Estimating: Which Is Right for Your Shop?
- Working with PDF Blueprints: Tips for Steel Estimators
- Steel shape dimensions and weights
- Steel weight and cost calculator
- SteelFlo pricing